you want potshots, alex??? here you go....

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff"><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Super-8mm in the DigitalAge:
You're like a FUKING BROKEN RECORD, nothing I have ever suggested has EVER been complimented by you...EVER, ever.</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>

is THAT what you are after??? my approval??
BWAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!!

/////no Shatzy, it's called fairness./////////

so f.r.i.g.g.i.n. what?

i think SOME of your ideas are dumb. i have a right to that... thanks. and FYI -- i've complemented you on your ideas
before... you've just never seen them.

/////// to quote you....BWAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!!yeah right, find one //////////

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff"><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Super-8mm in the DigitalAge:
For the record, up until a few months ago, ALL HOSTBOARD forums were 40 topics per page, that was the standard. As for more bandwidth, why? Each forum uses up less pages as a result. If only one forum wants to expand, Quick will receive $120.00 per year, one front page on one forum isn't going to affect bandwidth, and you know that. If more want extra topic posts on page one, then Quick starts making more money.

If at some point, more bandwidth is needed, than the money recieved would probably be more than what is needed to offset the "extra" bandwidth that until a few months ago was not deemed "extra" bandwidth.</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>

have you actually done the research into your 'plan'??? or is it mere rambling? exactly how far do you think your $120 a year would go in as far as HB is concerned? and exactly how many possible forums do you think are going to hop on that idea??? why pay for a stupid feature as 40-50 topic threads when they can get 25 FOR FREE????

USE YOUR THICK SKULL!!!!

////////why, why, why? Why do anything? Why, Shatzy already knows the answer! Shatzy knows all and knows what the people want, even without the people trying it out! Yes posters who only leave one a post a month want to see it fall of page one as quickly as possible!///////////////


<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff"><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Super-8mm in the DigitalAge:
(Alex sighs about women and math, now he's being told by a women that 25 posts on page one is the same as 40 or 45 posts on page one???)

...Several potshots in there.

I notice a HUGE difference between 25 versus 40 posts on the front page, ESPECIALLY now that we can do stickies. The difference becomes 100% less new topic posts per forum if a moderator has just 5 stickies on page one. This isn't based on a "whim", as you put it. It's based on thoughtful analysis.</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>

analysis my a.s.s.....
its based on an alex whim. you hardly get posters
anyway... but now you wanna argue extending your
forums to a larger field of view??? for what???

//////////Well, considering my Super-8 forum currently has 1,000 more views than Acropolis does, what can I say when you write something like "you hardly get any posters"????

I consider Acropolis an active forum, yet you turn around and call my super-8 forum, which has 1,000 more views than yours, a place that "hardly get's any posters". //////////

see my above comment... no one will pay for this feature.

///////then it really isn't going to be much of a big deal to implement then, is it?////////////

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff"><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Super-8mm in the DigitalAge:
I don't understand your point.</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>

of course you don't. rolleyes
the only thing you understand is the sound of
your own voice reverberating off the inside of your head.

//////I ask for a clarification, I get ridiculed//////////

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff"><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Super-8mm in the DigitalAge:
The point is your forum loses it's first page topics pretty quickly, just as one of my forums also does. If you are fine with that, fine, but that doesn't negate my interpretation of how others may feel. It's my opinion based on the fact that most people don't get past page one most of the time, unless they have already posted on a subject and want to re-visit it even after it has left page one. Most of the people who bring a post back to page one have already posted on it. So in fact, having 15 extra topic posts on page means an extra 1 day to 3 days of 1st page shelf life for anyone to instantly see a topic post and respond. That's a good thing in most instances.</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>

so does bumping.... or effective managment.
wanna analysis of how well your board gets viewed
by guests seeking the proverbial second page bliss?

just ask me..... i watch

/////////Just how do you watch all those forums at the same time anyway, and why?//////////////

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff"><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Super-8mm in the DigitalAge:
Gosh, you sound like Rick Dees when he talked about his 7 listeners.

You also sound like a a bible thumper. "The bible says..." "The Hostboard says...if you don't know better, then screw you..."

charming.</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>

jesus you ARE dense.
you only read what you want to read... interpret
what you will.. it bothers me not.
but there are not enough people to sit around and
babysit the people that refuse to read FAQs and
learn the mechanics of a message board system.

////it's really not for you to judge how people use Hostboard, (although you think it is), it's more about what works best, irrespective of what you think or want.//////////

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff"><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Super-8mm in the DigitalAge:
I never saw the topic post you speak of. As you recall, I asked a while back when did we switch to 25 topics. The response by Quick was "two months ago", Obviously I missed the annoucement.</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>

but yet... you are so hip on HB that you know
all about bandwidth and other feature resources, eh? clever. rolleyes

////// I miss one of Steven's posts, and this is the hostile reaction I receive from you./////////

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff"><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Super-8mm in the DigitalAge:
Since I never saw that topic post that you claim I saw, then that puts the kibash on this point.</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>

you saw......... because you posted. keep up.


///////Sigh. No I didn't, calm down./////////

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff"><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Super-8mm in the DigitalAge:
Your buddies gang up on me periodically. You then use their comments as some type of Hostboard mandate against me in your own posts, you've done this on more than one occasion.</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>

this is........again.......incorrect.
my 'buddies' are irrelevent. they are individual
people speaking out against something you have
said. they speak for themselves.

////////more BS. I love how the little cliques that hang together always bray the loudest when they are called on their wolfpack mentality and actions. /////////

i would gladly offer support to my claims against
you if you ever traveled outside of your obsession
with me and posted on other places (in which potshots by alex could be revealed).

///////this is just crazy. What obsession with you, you are the one who has ruined this topic post, THAT IS LOCATED ON MY FORUM!!!///////////


should i venture to the other S8 board for more alex potshots? or does that connect to me? ahhh... yes, it does connect to me.


///////once again, any banter you find on that particular forum will be from the same two idiots who ganged up on me before.//////

then where shall i look for more alex potshots?
hmmmm.... teenybopper forums you post on?

//////////////

Now this is rich. You posted a link on your forum once to a high school debate forum and call it interesting...

I post a follow-up question about Paul Wellstone, and you try and turn it into something illegitimate, Give it a rest. ///////

but then, that would come back to me as some sort
of 'unjust' thing i'm doing to you.

///////you just implied something rather tasteless, and you know it.//////////

the thing is..... no matter what you say...
you had no business in bringing my name into that
thread. whether those people post on my board,
i post on their board, or whatever... nothing
in that thread applied to me...

until you made it so.

//////they're your people, when you quit referring to them (as you have in the past) as some type of "consensus" against me, then I'll quit associating them with you...is that so hard to understand?///////

if you would like... i shall research potshots
you have made without any initial prompt....

////////I don't think you should waste your time, lets just say for everyone you find on me, I could find 20 that you done towards me, you interpret that however you want.///////////

just say the word, and i'm all on it.

but i will say this...
if you bring my name up one more time like that
in a post in which has no reason to be, 1quickSI
will be notified.

////////// That's just a threat, pure and simple. We both know Quick would probably never side with me about anything that has to do with you.

Don't use your friends comments against me, including your boyfriend TG, or Tard, as justification for a position that goes against me, and I won't mention them either.//////////

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff"><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Super-8mm in the DigitalAge:
(Gosh, now you've got me pre-predicting how you are going to react)</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>

there's that non-word again....

////But it fits.//////

<font color="#a62a2a" size="1">[ February 27, 2003 04:29 AM: Message edited by: Super-8mm in the DigitalAge ]</font>